Worryingly, one has become rather immune to horror stories emanating from
Boko Haram: The History
Regular visitors to the 1worldinternational weblog will be aware
of the origins of Boko Haram, the
terrorist group with Nigerian origins which has over the last few years
masterminded attacks against the Nigerian government, public infrastructure,
civilians and churches. In a previous article entitled “Boko Haram: The New Al-Qaeda?”,
1worldinternational highlighted the
threat posed by the group. The article also covered fears raised by the U.S.
about the Nigerian government’s inability to deal with the insurgency and the
prospect that the national problem may spiral into an international concern.
As always, the Boko Haram Islamist sect which opposes
polio vaccination programmes, for what many term the misguided reason that it is
a Western-led ploy to inflict AIDS on Muslim children and cause infertility
within that cross-section of the Nigerian society, have been blamed for the
killings. This week’s attack follows a
similar attack against aid workers in Pakistan
who had been administering polio medicine to those most prone to the disease. Police
spokesman Magaji Musa explained: “Gunmen on bikes opened fire on a health centre
in the Hotoro district killing seven, while an attack on the Zaria
Road area of the city claimed two lives.” Musa
continued: “They were working for the state government giving out polio
vaccinations at the time of the attack.”
Blow to Worldwide Fight against Polio
The latest attacks on health
personnel in Pakistan and Nigeria, allied with the continued threats to the
lives of aid workers in these regions, is indeed a massive blow to worldwide
efforts currently geared towards the eradication of the disease. In June of
last year, 1worldinternational reported,
in an article titled ‘Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) Declares Last
Stand against Polio’, the Global Polio Eradication Initiative’s launch of an
emergency action plan following fears of a resurgence of the disease in
countries where the disease was thought to have been eradicated. By way of
information, the GPEI was formed in
1988 and was spearheaded by the WHO, Rotary International, the United States
Center for Disease Control and Prevention and UNICEF. It is also supported by
polio-affected and donor governments, private foundations, development banks,
humanitarian and non-governmental organizations, corporate partners and more
than 20 million volunteers.
It is perhaps no coincidence that the countries in which the most stubborn
and obdurate opposition to the administration of medicine emanates are those –
Afghanistan, Pakistan and Nigeria - in
which polio remains endemic to levels needed to prevent the transmission of the
disease. The December 2012 and January 2013 attacks by alleged Taliban-linked
militants in Pakistan is indication of the continued lack of understanding
which is required from leaders of these communities if the Ban Ki-moon led
quest to “stamp out polio for good” is to be achieved in our lifetime.
Sound-off
In the circumstances, the GPEI and those leading the fight against the
dissease are left with essentially three options. The first and least favoured
is continuing with the same course of action, i.e. sending in aid workers
against the background of the real and severe risks of attacks on their person.
The second and middle of the road option entails praying and hoping that the
military might of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), the International
Security Assistance Force (ISAF) and the Nigerian government will prevail over
those of the Taliban, its allies and the Boko
Haram military sect. The third and most preferable option, and which in the
writer’s view is most likely to yield the most dividends, is that of engaging
and educating the opponents of the vaccination programme about the advantages
of immunization to future generations of Muslim children. Perhaps this will, to
some extent, assuage fears which manifests itself in the form of misguided views in respect of the aims and objectives of the programme.
In this regard, charity organisations who operate within the Islamic world
such as the Red Crescent may act as mediators and/or negotiators owing to the
fact that they may not face the same allegations levelled aganst Western-backed
organisations and aid workers which is that they are acting as agents of the
West and that they are essentially, propagating and cultivating a Western-backed
agenda. Unfortunately, without the co-operation of the current opponents of the
vaccination programme, who also wield such overarching power and influence over
the regions in which it is most prevalent, the battle against the disease will
be one with which future generations will be saddled.
No comments:
Post a Comment