NIGERIA: THE FIGHT AGAINST POLIO SUFFERS SIGNIFICANT SETBACK

Worryingly, one has become rather immune to horror stories emanating from Africa’s most populous country such that news of the killing of nine health workers said to be administering polio vaccines in northern Nigeria has not come as a shock.

 

Boko Haram: The History

 

Regular visitors to the 1worldinternational weblog will be aware of the origins of Boko Haram, the terrorist group with Nigerian origins which has over the last few years masterminded attacks against the Nigerian government, public infrastructure, civilians and churches. In a previous article entitled “Boko Haram: The New Al-Qaeda?”, 1worldinternational highlighted the threat posed by the group. The article also covered fears raised by the U.S. about the Nigerian government’s inability to deal with the insurgency and the prospect that the national problem may spiral into an international concern.
 

As always, the Boko Haram Islamist sect which opposes polio vaccination programmes, for what many term the misguided reason that it is a Western-led ploy to inflict AIDS on Muslim children and cause infertility within that cross-section of the Nigerian society, have been blamed for the killings.  This week’s attack follows a similar attack against aid workers in Pakistan who had been administering polio medicine to those most prone to the disease. Police spokesman Magaji Musa explained: “Gunmen on bikes opened fire on a health centre in the Hotoro district killing seven, while an attack on the Zaria Road area of the city claimed two lives.” Musa continued: “They were working for the state government giving out polio vaccinations at the time of the attack.”

 

Blow to Worldwide Fight against Polio

 

The latest attacks on health personnel in Pakistan and Nigeria, allied with the continued threats to the lives of aid workers in these regions, is indeed a massive blow to worldwide efforts currently geared towards the eradication of the disease. In June of last year, 1worldinternational reported, in an article titled ‘Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) Declares Last Stand against Polio’, the Global Polio Eradication Initiative’s launch of an emergency action plan following fears of a resurgence of the disease in countries where the disease was thought to have been eradicated. By way of information, the GPEI was formed in 1988 and was spearheaded by the WHO, Rotary International, the United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention and UNICEF. It is also supported by polio-affected and donor governments, private foundations, development banks, humanitarian and non-governmental organizations, corporate partners and more than 20 million volunteers.
 

It is perhaps no coincidence that the countries in which the most stubborn and obdurate opposition to the administration of medicine emanates are those – Afghanistan, Pakistan and Nigeria -  in which polio remains endemic to levels needed to prevent the transmission of the disease. The December 2012 and January 2013 attacks by alleged Taliban-linked militants in Pakistan is indication of the continued lack of understanding which is required from leaders of these communities if the Ban Ki-moon led quest to “stamp out polio for good” is to be achieved in our lifetime.

 

Sound-off

 

In the circumstances, the GPEI and those leading the fight against the dissease are left with essentially three options. The first and least favoured is continuing with the same course of action, i.e. sending in aid workers against the background of the real and severe risks of attacks on their person. The second and middle of the road option entails praying and hoping that the military might of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) and the Nigerian government will prevail over those of the Taliban, its allies and the Boko Haram military sect. The third and most preferable option, and which in the writer’s view is most likely to yield the most dividends, is that of engaging and educating the opponents of the vaccination programme about the advantages of immunization to future generations of Muslim children. Perhaps this will, to some extent, assuage fears which manifests itself in the form of misguided views in respect of the aims and objectives of the programme.
 

In this regard, charity organisations who operate within the Islamic world such as the Red Crescent may act as mediators and/or negotiators owing to the fact that they may not face the same allegations levelled aganst Western-backed organisations and aid workers which is that they are acting as agents of the West and that they are essentially, propagating and cultivating a Western-backed agenda. Unfortunately, without the co-operation of the current opponents of the vaccination programme, who also wield such overarching power and influence over the regions in which it is most prevalent, the battle against the disease will be one with which future generations will be saddled.

NIGERIA: CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY COMMITTED BY BOTH SIDES, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH CLAIM

Reports by one of the leading global human rights organisations, Human Rights Watch, that at least 2,800 people have been killed since the onset of the Boko Haram-led insurrection in the West African country of Nigeria are evidence of the scale of the humanitarian tragedy currently pervading Northern Nigeria.


In its Report, the organisation stated that both the Nigerian security authorities and the militant group were complicit in the commission of crimes against humanity. According to Human Rights Watch some of the attacks carried out since the commencement of the conflict bore the characteristics of “deliberate acts leading to population ‘cleansing’ based on religion or ethnicity”. In case the participants in the conflict need to be reminded, offenders charged with crimes against humanity can be prosecuted before the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague.


The Report attributes the killings of Muslim clerics critical of the group’s activities and innocent Christians to Boko Haram and at the same time blames the Nigerian authorities for “physical abuse, secret detentions, extortion, burning of houses, stealing money during raids, and extrajudicial killings of suspects”. Although the leadership of Boko Haram is yet to respond to the conclusions of the report, the government, via its spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Sagir Musa, denied that it had been involved in the ‘culture of impunity for violence’ which the report imputes to it. Lieutenant Colonel Musa averred: “There is no established or recorded case of extrajudicial killing, torture, arson or arbitrary arrest by the JTF (Nigeria’s joint military and police taskforce) in Borno state”.


Followers of global affairs and passive observers alike will note that the Islamist sect has waged a three-year long campaign against the government with the aim of establishing an Islamic state and in effect seceding from the country. Boko Haram are also rumoured to be backed by Somalia’s Al-Shabaab militia and Al-Qaeda who have of recent successfully made inroads – see Mali and Mauritania – into the Western region of Africa. Boko Haram’s notoriety and initial successes were of such significance that a United States Congressional Panel was established to address the threat posed by the group.


The government’s initial lackadaisical and disjointed attempts at dealing with the menace have now been replaced with a joint army and military crackdown commensurate with its opponent’s might. It has successfully conducted raids on areas within the northern part of the country, the region predominantly populated by Nigeria’s Muslims and which is effectively the group’s stomping ground. The group’s bases have been routed, its fighters arrested and some of its figureheads killed following the reinvigoration of the government’s campaign against the militancy. The killing of the group’s spokesman Abu Qaqa by the authorities in a gun battle last month against the authorities was just the news which the country’s beleaguered leader needed to placate critics who have lambasted the lack of urgency he has shown in his handling of the situation.


The Nigerian government at least acknowledges that military engagement on its own will not be sufficient to usher in the peace and tranquillity which previously reigned in the now tumultuous region of Northern Nigeria. To this end it has attempted to engage Boko Haram by way of negotiations in order to achieve an impasse in the dispute. However, Boko Haram’s continued demands for the full implementation of Sharia law in the whole of Northern Nigeria has put paid to hopes that a non-military solution to the troubles can be achieved in the circumstances. Aside highlighting the human tragedy pervading in the warring region at present, the Report does well to remind the protagonists in the conflict of the accountability which awaits them at the International Criminal Court after the war has been won and lost.

ANGOLA: VOTERS CHOOSE STATUS QUO OVER NEW DAWN

Angola’s President Eduardo Dos Santos appears not be giving up easily in what seemingly has become a 2-man race or contest between himself and Equatorial Guinea’s President Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo to be crowned Africa’s longest serving leader.


Election Results

Last week Dos Santos was elected by way of a landslide victory to serve a further five-year term as President. Currently aged 70 and having already led the country for 33 years, Dos Santos will be 75 by the end of his tenure. Early reports indicate that Dos Santos’s MPLA party won about 70 per cent of the votes while the rest was split between opposing parties UNITA and CASA-CE. Although MPLA’s victory was overwhelming this time, it was not as decisive as the 2008 elections where it amassed about 81 per cent of the votes.


Questions and Protests

As we are all too aware, no elections held in Africa passes without controversy and problems. It therefore comes as no surprise that the validity of the elections have been challenged by the government’s opponents. Concerns have been raised over alleged rigged ballots and the transparency of the election process. In an interview with the Reuters news agency following the announcement of the provisional results, a candidate seeking election on the platform of the opposing CASA-CE party William Tonet denounced the elections as “cheating”. Tonet added that the election results amounted to a “declaration of war” by MPLA.

The leaders of the country’s second largest party UNITA have also voiced their intention to challenge the election results. Pre-election, observers will recall that the party’s leader Isaias Samakuva called for the postponement of the elections for another month as a result of what he termed interference in the election process by the ruling MPLA as well as questions raised over the credibility of the country’s national election commission (CNE).


Giant Leaps

The disquiet which has stemmed from the elections should however not detract from the progress, in gargantuan proportions, which the country has made since the end of its 27-year long civil war which devastated the nation. Now Africa’s second largest oil producing country, its oil wealth has served as the fulcrum of its economic transformation. It is reported that the country experienced an average of 15 percent growth in the period between 2002 and 2008. Further and even more impressive is the fact that Angola reported the world’s highest annual average GDP growth at 11 percent between 2001 and 2010.


Sound-off

Unsurprisingly and much like its oil producing African counterparts Nigeria and Equatorial Guinea the oil wealth has failed to trickle down to those who occupy the bottom strata of its 18 million strong population and as a result endemic corruption, patronage, nepotism and poverty thrive below the glamorous face of the country which is most encapsulated by its skyscraper thronged capital, Luanda.

Perhaps in a bid to address these concerns, Dos Santos ran a re-election campaign which had at its centre the promise to reduce poverty and inequality backed by a declaration to invest $17 billion in the country’s energy sector. At the risk of being labelled a cynic or a pessimist, critics of the Dos Santos government have good basis upon which to base their damning indictments of the administration, after all Dos Santos has already had three decades to lead the country to the promised land but all he has delivered, in spite of the considerable resources which the country is blessed, is a nation with enormous social and economic disparities which may only be checked by a change of administration.

GLOBAL POLIO ERADICATION INITIATIVE (GPEI) DECLARES LAST STAND AGAINST POLIO

Today, 1worldinternational reports on the UN and WHO's redoubled efforts to tackle the resurgence of polio. The piece was recently written by the weblog's author and published by the NGO, RESULTS UK.





The fight against Polio (poliomyelitis) received a boost last week with the launch of an ‘emergency action plan’ by the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI). The news follows recent fears about the resurgence of the disease in countries such as the Congo and China where the disease was thought to have been eradicated.


Polio

Polio is a disease caused by a virus which operates within its victims’ nervous system. It affects children mainly under the age of five and often leads to paralysis and in some cases death.


The Master plan

The plan devised by the GPEI involves increasing the WHO’s current vaccination programmes in Nigeria, Pakistan and Afghanistan, the only three countries where polio remains endemic, to levels needed to prevent the transmission of the disease. If the programme is successful in eradicating the disease, polio will become only the second disease ever to have been eradicated after small pox.


The Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI)

The GPEI was formed in 1988 and was spearheaded by the WHO, Rotary International, the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and UNICEF. It is also supported by polio-affected and donor governments, private foundations, development banks, humanitarian and non-governmental organizations, corporate partners and more than 20 million volunteers.


Vaccinations and Difficulties

Vaccinations have to date been the most effective means of preventing the spread of the disease. The most common vaccines are oral polio vaccine (OPV) and inactivated polio vaccine (IPV). However, the programme has faced various challenges in the countries in which the disease is still endemic such as insecurity, weak health systems and poor sanitation. Adding to the mix are the volatile concoctions of political and religious problems which have also hampered the gains being made. For instance, extremist Islamic leaders in Pakistan and Nigeria continually denounce the vaccination programme as a western conspiracy thereby preventing health officials from administering vaccinations to populations who remain prone to contracting the disease.


The Last stand

The UN has joined the WHO in publicly highlighting the threats posed by the disease if left unchecked. "Wild viruses and wildfires have two things in common. If neglected, they can spread out of control. If handled properly, they can be stamped out for good,” the organisation’s Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said last week. According to Ban Ki-moon the Global Polio Eradication Initiative has only half of the $2 billion it needs to procure vaccines and deploy staff to cover the areas in the countries in which the disease is prevalent. The UN anticipates that about $40-50 billion will be saved in the cost of treatment by 2035, not to mention the countless lives of children at risk across the globe, if its last stand against polio is successful.

INTERNATIONAL CONDEMNATION FOR BOKO HARAM'S CHRISTMAS DAY ATTACKS IN NIGERIA

On 11th December 2011, 1worldinternational published a piece on Boko Haram, the terrorist group with Nigerian origins which has over the last few years masterminded attacks against the Nigerian government, public infrastructure, civilians and churches. In the article entitled “Boko Haram: The New Al-Qaeda?”, the writer highlighted the threat posed by the group. The article also covered fears raised by the U.S.A about the Nigerian government’s inability to deal with the insurgency and the prospect that the national problem may spiral into an international concern.


The Attacks

In a replication of its brazen series of attacks in Nigeria last Christmas, the group struck on 25th December 2011 in what appears to be a well thought out and coordinated attack leaving 40 dead and scores injured. The first attack occurred outside a Catholic Church situated near the capital city of Abuja, killing 35 and wounding around 50. It is reported that this was a suicide attack on worshippers milling around the church premises following the conclusion of the Christmas morning mass. The second blast occurred close to a church in the central city of Jos and further explosions occurred in the North-East towns of Damaturu and Gadaka. The Associated Press reports that the recent fatalities bring the total death toll from the insurgency to 504 this year.


International Condemnation

The attacks have led to widespread condemnation being heaped upon the group. The U.K. Foreign Secretary, William Hague said: “These are cowardly attacks on families gathered in peace and praying to celebrate a day which symbolises harmony and goodwill towards others. I offer my condolences to the bereaved and injured.” In the same vein, the White House Spokesman, James Carney said: “We condemn this senseless violence and tragic loss of life on Christmas day. We offer our sincere condolences to the Nigerian people and especially those who lost family and loved ones”. Further support has also come from the French and German governments. The French President Nicolas Sarkozy expressed “solidarity in Nigeria’s fight against terrorism” while the German Foreign Minister, Guido Westerwelle stated: “Even on Christmas day, the world is not spared from cowardice and the fear of terrorism.” The Vatican City also denounced the attacks in stating that the group’s action was an act of “blind hatred” seeking to “arouse and feed even more hatred and confusion”.


Sound-off

The group via its spokesman has claimed responsibility for the attacks. In its statement, the group said: “There will never be peace until our demands are met”. “We want all our brothers who have been incarcerated to be released; we want full implementation of the Sharia system and we want democracy and the constitution to be suspended.”

Analysts fear that the group has links to the al-Shabaab militia which controls large swathes of Somalia and al-Qaeda operatives with influence in the African states of Niger, Mauritania, and Chad to name but a few. Matters are not been helped by the Nigerian government who seem reluctant to acknowledge the threat posed by the group to the nation’s security and stability or the government’s hesitance to accept the assistance offered by the international community. The frayed dynamics of this already fractious country coupled with the latest insurgency leads observers to conclude that Nigeria may soon become West Africa’s equivalent to East Africa’s Somalia.

BOKO HARAM: THE NEW AL-QAEDA?

The recent report presented to the US House of Representatives Committee on Homeland Security by the Sub-Committee on Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence titled “Boko Haram: Emerging Threat to the US Homeland” highlights the increasing danger to national and international security which the Nigerian terror group now poses. The report chaired by Patrick Meehan, Chairman of the US Congressional Committee, declared that Boko Haram has “quickly evolved and poses an emerging threat to US interests and the US homeland”.

Alarmingly, the report acknowledged the potential link between Boko Haram and al-Qaeda which has previously been suspected by observers. It stated: “Boko Haram has the intent and may be developing capability to co-ordinate on a rhetorical and operational level” with al-Qaeda which is active in Africa, including in Algeria, Mali, Niger and Somalia. One notes that al-Shabab, the militant group with very close links to al-Qaeda has been engaged in a long-running conflict with the Somali government.


Who are Boko Haram?

Boko Haram is an Islamic organisation which was formed in 2002 with the aim of establishing an Islamic state in Northern Nigeria as it considers the present government unislamic and one which is run by unbelievers. The group is headquartered in the North-Eastern Nigerian city of Maiduguri and its official name of Jama’atu Ahlis Sunna Lidda’awati wal-Jihad, translates as “people committed to the propagation of the Prophet’s Teachings and Jihad.”

The group has been responsible for attacks on government buildings, churches, public infrastructure and police buildings which have resulted in the deaths of hundreds of people in the country although the death toll may surpass that presented in official figures. The profile of the group was previously restricted to the country’s populace; however that changed on 26th August 2011 when it orchestrated a bold suicide-bomb attack on the UN Headquarters in Abuja, the nation’s capital city, killing about 24 people. The group was also blamed for an attack in the Nigerian North-Eastern town of Damaturu which resulted in the deaths of dozens of people.


The Report’s Aims

It has been stated by those involved in producing the report that the US would take positive action in addressing the threat posed by Boko Haram so as to avoid a repeat of its intelligence services initial underestimation of militant groups such as al-Qaeda and the Haqqani network which is based in Pakistan. The report’s authors highlight the need for swift action in dealing with Boko Haram in stating: “If the US acts quickly on the military, intelligence and diplomatic fronts, it can ensure the relative protection of US interests while assisting the Nigerian government in containing Boko Haram.” The Nigerian government’s security forces have so far been unable to contain the threat posed by Boko Haram despite the deployment of a substantial number of military personnel to the Northern region of the country. Observers of recent events will not fail to have noticed recent comments made by President Goodluck Jonathan that the government intends to commence negotiations with the group.


Opposition to the Change in Government’s Tactics

This latest move, namely engaging in dialogue with the group, has however been met with the discerning cries of critics, not least that of the influential Nigerian Bar Association (NBA). In the keynote speech delivered by its President, Chief J.B. Daudu, at an event held last week – Human Rights National Security: The Challenges of Terrorism and Response of Law Enforcement Agencies in Nigeria – the NBA highlighted that any meetings between the government and Boko Haram may have the unwanted effect of sending a message to like-minded groups that the government only listens in the face of intimidation and terror. The NBA National President stressed: “The danger is not in the fact that negotiation on its own is not good but that (i) you are dealing with bounty-hunters and other opportunists and (ii) such meetings may send the signal to like-minded people prone to engage in similar acts that the government only listens when you intimidate and resort to terror.”


Recommendations of the Report

Despite the valid criticism, one can understand the change in tactic of the government. Certainly the deployment of military forces has not borne fruit and one can argue that the government is only taking a leaf out of the US and NATO book as both have proceeded to engage the Taliban in dialogue after 10 or so fruitless years of military warfare. It remains to be seen whether dialogue will prevent the further escalation of hostilities in a country of 150 million where poverty, corruption and insecurity are rife. The US and the Nigerian government will also do well to implement the recommendations contained in the report. Central to these were closer liaison between US Intelligence agencies and Nigerian security services, and increased US support for programmes which enhance the ability of Nigerian forces to target and counter Boko Haram attacks. Whatever one’s views on probable solutions to this issue, global security analysts will however welcome the fact that lessons have been learnt from the failure of the international community to tackle al-Qaeda in its infancy before it morphed into a full grown adult capable of carrying out attacks on the scale of 9/11.